Informing the climate debate
Addressing the climate challenge in aviation requires more than a “single bullet that solves everything”: Nazmiye suggests “a mix of solutions, for a range of geographies”.
“Only through independent academic research can we inform the debate in a transparent, evidence-based way, to allow novel ideas to come forward. For airports, transport and energy systems, the transition to net zero is complex. We need greater interaction between what society wants and the technology on offer to help solve the challenges we face.
“In conversations I have had with people in aviation, there is a recognition of a need to make changes to decarbonise, but some don’t know where to start. There is also uncertainty about the technology available, providing the infrastructure and constraints from an energy network perspective.”
She explains that an airport ground support provider may recognise that solely using electrical equipment will help better manage their costs, make them more efficient and help them get greener. But to charge many vehicles at once will require significant new infrastructure capacity.
For public chargers, airports will need to carefully consider how many are required, or whether new mobility solutions are worth investing in, she adds. Operators will need to understand what the energy requirement is likely to be in future years, and how best to provide for that extra demand.
Currently, there are very few data sets in terms of how energy is used within an airport and at what times, she adds. “When starting this research, I was struck by the complexity and the number of different people involved with energy systems at airports; sometimes with different priorities.”
She adds that being involved in the TRIG programme was hugely beneficial to her research.